Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date:  Fri, 19 Sep 2003 18:07:38 +0900
From:  Mekong Watch Japan <info@mekongwatch.org>
Subject:  [catfish 00013] WORLD BANK AWARE OF NEGATIVE IMPACTS OF LAM TA KHONG PUMP STORAGE PROJECT (THAILAND)
To:  catfish@mekongwatch.org
Message-Id:  <200309190907.h8J97cWe025504@smtp3.dti.ne.jp>
X-Mail-Count: 00013

Mekong Watch CATFISH TALES

TOPIC:  WORLD BANK AWARE OF NEGATIVE IMPACTS OF LAM TA KHONG PUMP STORAGE 
PROJECT (THAILAND)

DATE:  20 September 2003


WORLD BANK CONCERNED ABOUT NEGATIVE IMPACTS OF LAM TA KHONG PUMP STORAGE 
PROJECT
On September 3rd, Mekong Watch inquired to Japan's Ministry of Finance 
(MOF) about the World Bank's position on the negative impacts on villagers 
as a result of the Lam Ta Khong Pump Storage Project in Thailand.  MOF 
explained that the World Bank is very concerned about the negative impacts, 
and is considering taking steps to encourage the Electricity Generating 
Authority of Thailand (EGAT), the project implementer, to take action.

While this is welcome news, both MOF and the World Bank need to understand 
that stronger steps are still necessary.  Background information follows.


WHAT IS THE LAM TA KHONG PUMP STORAGE PROJECT?
The Lam Ta Khong Pump Storage Project is located in Nakhon Ratchasima, in 
central Thailand.  It was the first (and so far only) pump storage dam 
constructed in Thailand.  The development and feasibility studies for this 
project were done in 1991 by the Japan International Cooperation Agency 
(JICA).

In 1994, the Japanese government provided 18.2 billion yen (approx 170 
million US dollars), and the World Bank provided 100 million US dollars in 
financing.  Construction was supervised by the Electric Power Development 
Co., Ltd (EPDC).  Construction was completed in 2001 with an installed 
capacity of 500MW.

NEGATIVE IMPACTS OF THE LAM TO KHONG PROJECT
As part of this project, a reservoir was built on the top of a large hill 
by blasting away slabs of rock, and a tunnel was drilled from the top 
reservoir to another reservoir at the base of the hill.  This blasting work 
continued over a period of 2.5 years, and the dust from the blasting rained 
on nearby villages. Since then, villagers have developed serious 
respiratory disorders and other health problems, some resulting in 
death.  Crops have been damaged, and cows and other domestic animals have 
also become sick and died.

FAILED MITIGATION MEASURES
To minimize environmental damage, an Environment Mitigation and Development 
Plan was made for this project in 1992, but most of it has not been 
implemented.  In cases where parts of the mitigation plan were implemented, 
affected people did not benefit.  For example, the mitigation plan 
recommended blasting be done only once a day to prevent dust 
pollution.   In actual practice, blasting occurred twice a day.  A measure 
that was actually implemented was the construction of a pond for water 
supply, since the project would decrease availability of ground water.  The 
water in this pond was so muddy, however, that it could not be used even 
for bathing, much less drinking.

AFFECTED PEOPLE CALL FOR A STUDY OF DAMAGES
Residents affected by the dust pollution from blasting have requested that 
EGAT, the project implementer, take steps to determine the precise cause of 
the deterioration in villagers' health and other damages, and to implement 
necessary remedial measures.  As a result of the residents' requests, a 
government committee was established in 2001 to look for solutions to the 
problems.  EGAT, however, refused to provide any funding for a survey into 
the health impacts, paralyzing the committee.  Hence, no measures have been 
implemented to resolve problems.

Affected people and NGOs have demanded that the World Bank and the Japan 
Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC) apply more pressure on EGAT to 
fund the government committee to conduct a fair study on the impacts of the 
project on villagers' health.  The World Bank and JBIC promised to convey 
the people's concerns to EGAT, but have not moved much further than 
this.  While they could conduct their own surveys, they have instead 
stopped at watching what EGAT will do (or not do) next.

RECENT DEVELOPMENT
Upon inquiry by Mekong Watch, Japan's Finance Ministry has made it clear 
that the World Bank is aware of the environmental impacts of the Lam Ta 
Khong dam.  In order to continue monitoring the project after completion, 
the World Bank is now requiring EGAT to report periodically to the World 
Bank on the steps it is taking to deal with the environmental impacts of 
the project. MOF also explained that it is urging the World Bank to 
disclose the currently classified Implementation Completion Report, as well 
as the periodical reports that EGAT is supposed to submit.

The villagers affected by the Lam Ta Khong project have suffered tremendous 
damage, and EGAT has failed to respond to their claims. As a start, the 
World Bank and JBIC must step up pressure so that EGAT will support a fair 
survey of the impacts on the villagers.  The World Bank and JBIC themselves 
should also disclose relevant information.  Only then will we know if the 
Environment Mitigation and Development Plan will be helpful, and even then, 
independent monitoring of the Mitigation Plan’s implementation will be 
necessary.